Apple App Store · Guideline 4.8 — Login Services

How to Fix App Store Guideline 4.8 Login Services Rejection

Resolve an Apple Guideline 4.8 rejection by adding a qualifying privacy-preserving login option or proving that a listed exception applies.

Policy-grounded recovery guideOfficial policy ↗
Have the rejection message open?Get a free diagnosis now. Upgrade to the complete $29 Fix Pack only if it is useful.
Analyze this rejection →

Direct answer

If your app uses Google, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, Amazon, WeChat, or another third-party or social service to create or authenticate the user's primary account, add an equivalent login option that satisfies all three privacy features in Guideline 4.8—or document why one of Apple's listed exceptions applies. Sign in with Apple is the usual way to provide those features, but the current rule is written in terms of the outcome the alternative login must deliver.

Official sources checked

Match the wording in your rejection

A social or third-party login is offered without an equivalent privacy-preserving option

Classify the login against Guideline 4.8 and its listed exceptions. If no exception applies, provide an equivalent option on every relevant login surface.

Sign in with Apple is visible but fails during review

Audit the shipped entitlement, App ID grouping, Services ID or bundle audience, redirect URI, key configuration, nonce and state handling, and backend availability.

App Review says the alternative login is difficult to find or not equivalent

Verify placement, visual prominence, device layouts, and all three privacy outcomes in the current rule rather than relying on the existence of another button.

What this rejection usually means

A 4.8 rejection means App Review could not verify an equivalent privacy-preserving login option alongside a third-party or social login used for the app's primary account. The option may be missing, unavailable on one supported device, visually obscured, broken in the review build, or excluded under an exception that the reviewer cannot verify. Ordinary email-and-password login should not be assumed to qualify when it does not let users keep their email address private.

Likely rejection signals

  • Google, Facebook, X, LinkedIn, Amazon, WeChat, or another social login creates or authenticates the app's primary account
  • The equivalent login option is missing from onboarding, sign-up, or a supported device layout
  • Sign in with Apple fails because the capability, entitlement, App ID grouping, client ID, redirect URI, or backend token validation is inconsistent
  • The app claims an education, enterprise, government-ID, or third-party-service exception without evidence that the product fits it

Recovery plan

  1. Inventory every sign-up and sign-in path. Confirm which methods create or authenticate the primary account users need to access the app's features and services.
  2. Compare the app with Apple's five listed exceptions. If none applies, add an equivalent login option everywhere the third-party login is offered. Sign in with Apple is the standard implementation and should follow Apple's interface guidance rather than a custom look-alike control.
  3. For Sign in with Apple, enable the capability on the correct App ID, regenerate the provisioning profile, and verify the com.apple.developer.applesignin entitlement in the exact archived build. Group related apps and websites under the intended primary App ID.
  4. Reconcile the backend configuration: bundle or Services ID, Team ID, key ID, private key, registered domains and return URLs, redirect URI, nonce and state checks, and identity-token audience. Handle Apple's private relay address and the fact that name and email may only be returned on the first authorization.
  5. Test the submitted build from a clean install on every supported device family with a new Apple Account authorization, Hide My Email, a returning user, a revoked authorization, and any account-linking flow. Keep the backend and reviewer account available throughout review.
  6. In Notes for Review, give the exact taps to each login option, state which Guideline 4.8 path you rely on, and include only verified configuration and behavior present in the submitted build.

Evidence to prepare

  • Screenshots or a short recording of every login surface on iPhone and iPad
  • The shipped app's Sign in with Apple entitlement and App ID capability configuration
  • Backend mapping for Team ID, bundle or Services ID, key ID, domains, and return URLs
  • Clean-account tests covering Hide My Email, returning users, revocation, and account linking
  • Reviewer instructions and any factual evidence supporting a listed exception

Appeal or fix first?

APPEAL / CLARIFY

Clarify or appeal when the submitted app already offers a working equivalent option, exclusively uses your own account system, or clearly fits one of Apple's listed exceptions. Identify the exact login path or exception and attach release-specific evidence.

FIX BEFORE RESUBMITTING

Fix before resubmitting when a third-party or social login authenticates the primary account and no qualifying equivalent option is available, or when Sign in with Apple is present but fails, is hidden, or cannot complete account creation in the review build.

Choose the next action

What you can verifyRecommended path
A third-party service authenticates the user's primary account and no listed exception appliesFix first by adding a qualifying equivalent option throughout the sign-up and sign-in flow.
The app exclusively uses its own account system or clearly fits a listed exceptionClarify with release-specific evidence and the exact login path or exception.
Sign in with Apple is already present but the reviewer cannot complete itRepair and test the end-to-end configuration; a screenshot of the button is not enough.

Reviewer response framework

Your response should be factual, short, and limited to the submitted build. Cover these points:

  1. Name every login method available in the submitted build.
  2. State where the reviewer can find and complete the equivalent option.
  3. Describe the verified capability or backend correction without exposing keys or secrets.
  4. If relying on an exception, quote the applicable category and explain the product facts that satisfy it.
  5. Provide a short clean-install test path and confirm the backend is available for review.

Frequently asked questions

Does Guideline 4.8 always require Sign in with Apple?

No. Apple's current wording requires an equivalent login option with three privacy features when a third-party or social service authenticates the user's primary account, and it lists five exceptions. Sign in with Apple is the standard way to meet those features, but first classify the app and its login flow against the actual rule.

Does email and password satisfy Guideline 4.8?

Do not assume so. A normal email-and-password flow usually requires the user's real email and therefore may not provide the option to keep the email address private. Verify all three features in the current rule.

Can I remove Google or Facebook login instead?

Potentially, if the released app then exclusively uses your own account system and existing users retain a reliable way to access their accounts. Do not hide a social login only during review or strand accounts that were created with it.

Need a rejection-specific plan?

Start with the free diagnosis. The $29 Fix Pack adds the prioritized remediation plan, evidence checklist, reviewer-ready reply, and preflight.

Analyze my rejection

Source: Apple App Review Guidelines — 4.8 Login Services. Platform policies change. Verify the official rule before submitting. Resubmit AI provides technical and editorial decision support, not an approval guarantee or legal advice.